Workplace Rant: Why do manufacturers keep changing communication protocols every 5 years (Profibus → Profinet → OPC UA → TSN) when the machines on my floor need to run for 20+ years? Is this planned obsolescence or genuine innovation?

Q: Workplace Rant: Why do manufacturers keep changing communication protocols every 5 years (Profibus → Profinet → OPC UA → TSN) when the machines on my floor need to run for 20+ years? Is this planned obsolescence or genuine innovation?

I totally get your frustration! It feels like just when you&#39;ve finally got everything working smoothly with one protocol, manufacturers roll out something new. From what I can see, this evolution from Profibus (1990s) to Profinet (2000s) to OPC UA (2010s) and now TSN isn&#39;t exactly planned obsolescence - it&#39;s more about genuine technological advancement driven by changing needs.Each protocol solved specific problems: Profibus was great for its time but had bandwidth limitations. Profinet brought Ethernet-based real-time communication. OPC UA added cross-platform interoperability and security. Now TSN (Time-Sensitive Networking) provides deterministic timing over standard Ethernet - something critical for advanced automation and Industry 4.0 applications.The real challenge is that industrial equipment needs to last 20+ years while IT/OT convergence happens much faster. Manufacturers are trying to balance backward compatibility with forward-looking innovation. Many of these protocols are designed to work together - for example, PROFINET over TSN allows existing PROFINET systems to leverage TSN&#39;s benefits.It&#39;s frustrating, but it&#39;s less about forcing upgrades and more about keeping pace with capabilities like real-time data exchange, cybersecurity needs, and the demands of smart manufacturing. The good news is that many industrial networks can run multiple protocols simultaneously, so you don&#39;t necessarily have to rip and replace everything at once!

Question

Accepted Answer

I totally get your frustration! It feels like just when you've finally got everything working smoothly with one protocol, manufacturers roll out something new. From what I can see, this evolution from Profibus (1990s) to Profinet (2000s) to OPC UA (2010s) and now TSN isn't exactly planned obsolescence - it's more about genuine technological advancement driven by changing needs.

Each protocol solved specific problems: Profibus was great for its time but had bandwidth limitations. Profinet brought Ethernet-based real-time communication. OPC UA added cross-platform interoperability and security. Now TSN (Time-Sensitive Networking) provides deterministic timing over standard Ethernet - something critical for advanced automation and Industry 4.0 applications.

The real challenge is that industrial equipment needs to last 20+ years while IT/OT convergence happens much faster. Manufacturers are trying to balance backward compatibility with forward-looking innovation. Many of these protocols are designed to work together - for example, PROFINET over TSN allows existing PROFINET systems to leverage TSN's benefits.

It's frustrating, but it's less about forcing upgrades and more about keeping pace with capabilities like real-time data exchange, cybersecurity needs, and the demands of smart manufacturing. The good news is that many industrial networks can run multiple protocols simultaneously, so you don't necessarily have to rip and replace everything at once!

Item added to your cart

Frequently Asked Questions

Workplace Rant: Why do manufacturers keep changing communication protocols every 5 years (Profibus → Profinet → OPC UA → TSN) when the machines on my floor need to run for 20+ years? Is this planned obsolescence or genuine innovation?

Recent Q&A

Contact form

Country/region

Language