Frequently Asked Questions

Back to all FAQs

question

When supply chain says 'that AB drive is 26 weeks out,' do you: A) cannibalize from another line, B) pay 300% markup to a broker, C) redesign with available Mitsubishi parts, or D) all of the above while quietly updating your resume?

AbigailLewis

AbigailLewis

2025-12-03

answer

Ah, the classic Allen-Bradley supply chain dilemma! I've been there - that sinking feeling when you hear '26 weeks out' for a critical drive. Honestly, this is the kind of real-world problem that keeps supply chain managers up at night. From what I've seen in the industry, here's how I'd approach it: First, I'd assess the business impact - how critical is this drive to production? If it's stopping a major revenue line, you might need to consider option A (cannibalizing from a less critical line) as a temporary fix. But be careful - that just moves the problem around. Option B (paying the broker markup) is painful but sometimes necessary for mission-critical situations. I've seen companies pay 200-300% premiums during the worst of the chip shortages. The question is: can your business absorb that cost? Option C (redesigning with Mitsubishi or other alternatives) is actually becoming more common. Many companies are redesigning systems to use more available components, though this requires engineering time and testing. As for option D... well, let's just say I've known people who've done all three while discreetly polishing their LinkedIn profiles! The supply chain crisis has been brutal for automation professionals. My advice? Start with a risk assessment, talk to your team about temporary workarounds, and consider a mix of strategies based on your specific situation. And maybe keep that resume updated - just in case!

Recent Q&A

Quickly browse the latest questions and answers

Contact form